Skip to the frames
Ele
Frame 288 · enlargement

Are Modern Cars Truly Superior? Comparing Reliability and Complexity from Past to Present

Electric Vehicles Sep 18, 2026 Jim Travers

A look at how vehicle reliability and repairability have evolved from the 1960s to today, revealing the trade-offs of modern automotive technology.

Are Modern Cars Truly Superior? Comparing Reliability and Complexity from Past to Present

Reflecting on the automotive landscape of the 1960s, it’s easy to get nostalgic about the simplicity and charm of older cars. Back then, organizations like Consumer Reports maintained detailed lists of delivery defects found in new vehicles, highlighting a range of issues from minor trim defects to critical mechanical failures. Some defects were alarming, including incorrectly installed steering components or defective engine blocks, which left consumers with plenty of reasons for concern.

SUVs ruled suburban roads, station wagons were the family utility vehicles of choice

In their April 1966 issue, Consumer Reports documented various flaws with vehicles, alongside an unvarnished presentation style. Issues ranged from transmission leaks and chafed power steering hoses to more concerning problems such as malfunctioning engines. This transparency invited both caution and criticism from potential buyers.

engineer checking the controls and driver’s seating position in the 1950s

Today, the common adage “They don’t make them like they used to” resonates, especially within classic car communities. Yet, the reality is that older cars weren't inherently better or more reliable, despite what enthusiasts might claim. In fact, many could argue that contemporary vehicles have made significant advancements in safety and reliability.

Station wagon 4X8 sheet of plywood 1957 Ford Country Sedan test

Changing Expectations and Build Quality

One significant factor contributing to perceptions of quality is that consumer expectations have vastly shifted over the decades. In the 1960s, many cars suffered from poor build quality, and break downs were frequent enough to categorize vehicles as disposable items. High turnover rates were common as consumers typically traded in vehicles every few years, rarely considering them a long-term investment. The average age of vehicles on the road today, on the other hand, has significantly increased, with many now exceeding a decade of use.

Checker Marathon International Travelall and a Chevrolet Suburban

Jake Fisher, senior director of auto testing for Consumer Reports, notes how today's vehicles are designed with one critical aspect in mind—longevity. Cars built in the 1960s were often expected to last no more than 100,000 miles, hence the odometer’s reset feature at that threshold. Conversely, today’s used cars with similar mileage are often seen as having considerable life left in them.

Changing a tire is made easier thanks to the hydropneumatic suspension on this Citroen DS

Technological Complexity and Repairability

While older vehicles had their drawbacks, the simplicity of their design allowed for easier repairs. Many defects found in the past could often be easily solved by a visit to a mechanic or a knowledgeable owner. In contrast, today's cars boast anywhere from 1,400 to over 3,000 microprocessors running complex systems that can complicate repairs significantly. These advancements, although fostering improved reliability and safety, come with the downside of increased complexity.

1963 Plymouth Valiant

Modern infotainment systems and electronics, while providing features that enhance user experience, also introduce issues not present in older vehicles. Fisher points out that problems related to electronic systems can be elusive and intermittent, making them more challenging to diagnose and repair than mechanical failures typical of the past.

Brake testing has been a staple of CR testing since the 1950s
Consumer Reports Auto Testing in the 1960s

Reliability vs. Delivery Defects

Historically, Consumer Reports listed defects to illustrate delivery issues, but this often muddled perceptions of long-term reliability. As manufacturing standards improved, Consumer Reports ceased this practice decades ago, recognizing that various quality assurances had reduced issues such as loose steering boxes—a common concern in earlier models.

Engineers test MGA and an Alfa Romeo Giulietta

Nevertheless, contemporary vehicles still encounter defects, with Consumer Reports purchasing upwards of 50 cars annually for rigorous testing. Issues commonly recur, requiring multiple visits to service centers for repairs, suggesting our cars still carry a burden of complexity despite improvements in reliability.

For many classic car enthusiasts, the allure of older vehicles is often based on emotional ties rather than practical realities. While older cars can be easier to fix for owners with basic mechanical training, they are also more prone to unexpected failures that can leave drivers stranded. Newer vehicles, rich with advanced technology, may require professional equipment and diagnostics to address malfunctions, often leading to longer wait times for repairs.

The Long-Term View

The nostalgic perspective that "they don't make them like they used to" can carry some weight, especially when appreciating the straightforward nature of classic automobiles. However, the truth is that modern cars may not just be more reliable; they’re designed with consumer expectations in mind, offering safer and more efficient transportation. Yet, the trade-off is an increase in complexity that compromises some repairs' accessibility and ease.

In the end, while vintage cars have their charm and simplicity, the durability and safety of contemporary vehicles are undeniable. Moving forward, it remains to be seen just how many of today’s cars will remain operational and cherished on the roads fifty years from now, in an era where cars are not just tools for travel but complex systems integrated into our daily lives.

[Source: Hagerty Media]

Source: Jim Travers · www.hagerty.com

Same roll